Bretton Woods 3.0
- 24 February 2025 (7 min read)
Bretton Woods 2.0”, coined by Folkerts-Landau and Garber in 2003, described a monetary order organised around China recycling its surpluses into US debt, thus acting as both the source of the deterioration of the US current account and the enabler of its sustainability. We think that a “Bretton Woods 3.0” framework has emerged, with two major differences with the Folkerts-Landau/Garber model: first, the key counterpart of the US funding need is a mature economy, Europe. Since 2022, Euro area investors have been the largest foreign holders of US government debt. This should be seen as beneficial to the US: it is safer to rely on savings from a political and military ally to continue running spendthrift fiscal policies than on a geopolitical rival such as China. Second, this does not entail a massive US bilateral current account deficit: the US trade deficit with the Euro area in goods is offset by strong exports of intellectual property. This puts the US in a comfortable position.
Why fix something that is not broken? The new Chair of the US Council of Economic Advisors came up with ideas to force Europeans to increase their exposure to US debt, as a “fee” to benefit from US military support and avoid tariffs. This is “overkill” since Europeans are already spontaneously strongly contributing to the US financial sustainability. In his plans, Europeans would also be requested to appreciate their currency vis-à-vis the dollar under a “Mar A Lago Accord”, which – short of financial wizardry which we think is impractical – contradicts the first objective, while weighing on Europe’s already shaky growth performance. A limit to such US coercive approach is that the Europeans’ alternative strategies – e.g. developing their own defence sovereignty – could become economically attractive if the cost of the transatlantic relationship becomes too high. We find it interesting that Friedrich Merz, CDU-leader and winner of last Sunday’s election, has expressed interest for such strategic overhaul. A coalition with SPD could make it happen, but that non-mainstream parties will have the possibility to block the constitutional reforms needed to increase Germany’s fiscal space will however be an obstacle.
Subscribe to updates
Have our latest insights delivered straight to your inbox
Disclaimer
This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.
It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.
All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.
Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.
Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent.
Risk Warning
The value of investments, and the income from them, can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.